Restoration Logistics
AI Client Brief
AI GENERATED60-Second Brief
Restoration Logistics is a multi-service restoration/disaster response client focused on increasing qualified emergency leads through a mix of PPC, SEO (including large-scale content optimization across 1,400+ pages), and local reputation management. The relationship is currently centered on fixing PPC performance/lead quality issues, reconciling conversion tracking discrepancies (Google Ads vs. actual call quality), and strengthening local SEO/GMB outcomes—especially in Denver and Boulder. Recent work has shown positive engagement signals (improved CTAs, reduced bounce rates), but the client needs clearer reporting, faster feedback loops on call quality, and confidence that tracking and infrastructure (Cloudflare/GA accounts) are stable and accurate.
Communication Style
They need proactive, written follow-ups after meetings with clear action items, owners, and timelines. Performance conversations should be grounded in reconciled metrics (Ads + call quality + GMB call trends) and framed around lead quality, not just volume. Expect low tolerance for ambiguity in conversion reporting.
Decision Makers
Mike (Restoration Logistics stakeholder), St. George and Associates (influential partner group; likely involved in approvals and direction-setting)
Key Contacts
Mike (Client stakeholder (Restoration Logistics)): Appears directly involved in performance discussions; likely values clear, metric-backed updates and fast answers on PPC lead quality and tracking. St. George and Associates (Partner/consulting group involved with client): Multiple meetings logged; treat as influential stakeholders. Provide structured recaps, action plans, and clear accountability after each touchpoint.
Active Projects
Recent Wins
Current Challenges
Churn Risk Assessment
58% RISKRisk Factors
- ⚠No action items recorded (0 total), preventing measurement of progress and accountability
- ⚠No recent meeting sentiment data, limiting visibility into satisfaction and potential churn signals
- ⚠Engagement is evidenced by meetings, but outcomes and next steps are not documented in the provided data
Retention Recommendations
- ★Implement action item tracking immediately: capture 3–5 concrete next steps after each meeting with owner and due date to establish measurable progress
- ★Add a lightweight sentiment capture after each meeting (e.g., 1–5 satisfaction rating + brief notes on concerns/positives) to establish a trend line
- ★Send a post-meeting recap within 24 hours summarizing decisions, deliverables, and timelines to reinforce momentum and reduce ambiguity
- ★At the next meeting, align on success metrics and near-term milestones (e.g., campaign launches, lead volume targets, CPL/CPA targets) so engagement translates into outcomes
Health Score Breakdown
Restoration Logistics shows moderate overall health driven primarily by consistent meeting cadence (8 total meetings) and a very recent last meeting (7 days ago), which supports ongoing engagement. However, there is no action item tracking (0 total action items), making it impossible to confirm progress, accountability, or delivery follow-through from either side. Additionally, there is no recent meeting sentiment data, limiting visibility into satisfaction and relationship trajectory. These data gaps increase risk because they reduce early warning signals and make outcomes harder to manage.
Brief generated: Feb 9, 2026, 12:00 AM